lewtot184
Well-Known Member
Unknown thick black gasket. Similar to 1009 results.
Thank you! Looks good!
I use 8519 with my edelbrock heads. No issues.Thank you! Looks good!
Is there a reason you wouldn't choose the 1009? Cost?A word of caution if the rockers are the unbushed Comp Pro-Magnums.
They had a history of galling/seizing on the shaft if the springs were near/over 350lbs open.
Since you’re taking it apart anyway, now is the time to pull all that stuff apart and inspect for unhappiness.
The dyno info looks like it’s from Desktop Dyno 2000.
Fwiw, there have been a couple of similarly built 440’s dynoed here using that same cam.
They ran great, but made noticeably less power than what’s on that sheet.
But, to answer the first question…….. I use the FP 8519’s on that type of build.
I will for sure be doing a close inspection on the heads when I have them off. Thanks for the heads up.A word of caution if the rockers are the unbushed Comp Pro-Magnums.
They had a history of galling/seizing on the shaft if the springs were near/over 350lbs open.
Since you’re taking it apart anyway, now is the time to pull all that stuff apart and inspect for unhappiness.
The dyno info looks like it’s from Desktop Dyno 2000.
Fwiw, there have been a couple of similarly built 440’s dynoed here using that same cam.
They ran great, but made noticeably less power than what’s on that sheet.
But, to answer the first question…….. I use the FP 8519’s on that type of build.
Post #20.Is there a reason you wouldn't choose the 1009? Cost?
What kind of power numbers did you see with that cam? I was thinking that Desktop Dyno might be 100 horsepower optimistic at 542.A word of caution if the rockers are the unbushed Comp Pro-Magnums.
They had a history of galling/seizing on the shaft if the springs were near/over 350lbs open.
Since you’re taking it apart anyway, now is the time to pull all that stuff apart and inspect for unhappiness.
The dyno info looks like it’s from Desktop Dyno 2000.
Fwiw, there have been a couple of similarly built 440’s dynoed here using that same cam.
They ran great, but made noticeably less power than what’s on that sheet.
But, to answer the first question…….. I use the FP 8519’s on that type of build.
Ok thank you. Yes I've torched one on a 4.31 bore. Mainly run cometics now.Post #20.
I’ve had first hand experience of the 1009 gasket hanging on the edge of the bore and the fire ring getting squeezed over the edge, allowing the combustion gasses to get past the fire ring and torch the gasket.
So, I just won’t use them any longer on a 440 or 400 block.
Later model blocks with the big chamfer at the top of the bore are especially susceptible to this.
If it’s an application where I feel the 8519 isn’t up to the job……it’s gets Cometics.