• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

I KNEW it......

Stone Age humans did not have the ability to raise 700 ton blocks of stone and place them 20 feet above ground in walls, nor did they have the ability to move such stones up to Machu Picchu from 10,000 feet below on the valley floor. There is a method however, to move and place large stones that such peoples could have used, to build Stonehenge as an example. In countries where there is an abundance of sand or soft earth that can be excavated they could place uprights by digging a slot and gradually letting the weight of the stone slide it down into the slot. Then fill in level and muscle the cap stone in place over the uprights and excavate till they settle on top of them. Repeat till the complex is built and then excavate it all. Bob's yer Uncle.
 
Last edited:
The Stonehenge stones were even quarried a fair distance away from the site IIRC.

One of the "solutions" to some of these problems is that labor was extremely cheap back than.

So cheap in fact to the likes of kings, pharaohs and other dictators, that it was expendable.


I watched a show about raising monoliths/obelisks a few years ago and the just barely touched on that by saying they didn't have enough people on hand to even guide the crane they had to resort to, yet they totally missed the point that the civilization that erected the original monuments had potentially tens of thousands or more of human laborers that were either indentured, or even owned as property with which to complete the projects.
 
He dedicates his entire life to something that nobody except maybe 10 people in the world give a rat's *** about.

And, since this is the case, is it more. or, less likely this scientist would jealously guard his ideas, work product, discoveries, articles and papers published that detail his beliefs , findings and theories? I would argue for more likely, and here's why; Human nature. Sure there are people who are so "decent" that they share and bend and compromise in the thirst for the truth of whatever they are interested in. Most humans are not wired that way. Humans are greedy, jealous, distrustful, conniving ladder climbers who clutch their accomplishments to their breasts and defend them against all comers in the quest to not be diminished in the eyes of others. Power is a corrupt master. Gaining it is a quest, keeping it is a battle. Scientists of all stripes routinely ridicule others hypothesis's when those ideas contradict the established narrative. Graham Hancock is STILL being excoriated on a daily basis even after finds like Gobekli Tepe seem to prove him to be correct all along. No sir, I have little faith in truth being disseminated by these scientists. They will do and say whatever thing preserves the status quo, and , or, their own findings on the subject.
Hey Ghost.... as a scientist myself, I will respond to your stuff.
1. Scientists guard their research? Definitely yes
2. Some people are "decent" share/bend? A VERY large percentage of those people are scientists. Seriously, scientists don't do science for the glory. How many scientists names do you even know? 10 maybe? Scientists don't do it for the money either (pay is only "so so")
3. Scientists defend their own work? Yes, this is true, but not nearly to the extent you describe.
4. Power is a corrupt master? Yes, but scientists rarely have ANY power at all. It's the big businessmen that own the companies the scientists work for that have all the power....THEY are usually the ones that become corrupt.
5. Scientists ridicule other hypothesis? Yes, they do if the hypothesis makes no sense at all. As a group, scientists are usually correct about this....not always....but usually.

OK Ghost.....how many scientists do you know personally? How many friends do you have, that you trust, that are scientists? If you don't know any, then scientists are just lumped into the group "THEM" and "WE" don't trust "THEM" (do you see my point?)

I know AT LEAST 1,000 scientists personally. People I have worked with, personal friends, etc. Are there some bad apples? YES Are scientists, as a group, more honest and ethical than most people? YES
 
Hey Ghost.... as a scientist myself, I will respond to your stuff.
1. Scientists guard their research? Definitely yes
2. Some people are "decent" share/bend? A VERY large percentage of those people are scientists. Seriously, scientists don't do science for the glory. How many scientists names do you even know? 10 maybe? Scientists don't do it for the money either (pay is only "so so")
3. Scientists defend their own work? Yes, this is true, but not nearly to the extent you describe.
4. Power is a corrupt master? Yes, but scientists rarely have ANY power at all. It's the big businessmen that own the companies the scientists work for that have all the power....THEY are usually the ones that become corrupt.
5. Scientists ridicule other hypothesis? Yes, they do if the hypothesis makes no sense at all. As a group, scientists are usually correct about this....not always....but usually.

OK Ghost.....how many scientists do you know personally? How many friends do you have, that you trust, that are scientists? If you don't know any, then scientists are just lumped into the group "THEM" and "WE" don't trust "THEM" (do you see my point?)

I know AT LEAST 1,000 scientists personally. People I have worked with, personal friends, etc. Are there some bad apples? YES Are scientists, as a group, more honest and ethical than most people? YES
I made a mistake in saying Scientists. I really meant archeologists. My son is a theoretical Nuclear Physicist. He is the only scientist that I know.
 
OK, let's cut to the chase. In the 60th we were told we are in for freezing temperatures, & now the earth is warming.
:praying:

----> It all comes down to carbon tax and redistribution of wealth.:nutkick:
 
I made a mistake in saying Scientists. I really meant archeologists. My son is a theoretical Nuclear Physicist. He is the only scientist that I know.
No problem...then you know what I mean, right? I bet your son is a pretty good guy, reasonably honest, tells you what he thinks.....not 100% right all the time, but he wouldn't outright "cheat" somebody, right? Most scientists are pretty much on the up & up.

I don't know any archeologists, but I think I see your point. Those guys are NEVER rich & usually they have to beg "this rich guy" or "that foundation" to get the money to even do their job (& get a paycheck). I can see how they might be tempted to "bend the truth to keep a paycheck"...but I still think they're probably, overall, pretty honest.
 
Last edited:
No problem...then you know what I mean, right? I bet your son is a pretty good guy, reasonably honest, tells you what he thinks.....not 100% right all the time, but he wouldn't outright "cheat" somebody, right? Most scientists are pretty much on the up & up.

I don't know any archeologists, but I think I see your point. Those guys are NEVER rich & usually they have to beg "this rich guy" or "that foundation" to get the money to even do their job (& get a paycheck). I can see how they might be tempted to "bend the truth to keep a paycheck"...but I still think they're probably, overall, pretty honest.
It's not so much dishonesty as it is outright ridicule and character assassination towards anyone who makes claims which show that the long held and defended narratives are dead wrong. No matter how much actual evidence is compiled and placed in front of them. It is misleading the global population as to our true history for silly reasons like " Being proven wrong", " Casting doubt on the Bibles stories", or " Rewriting the history books". If there is new information out there then I for one want to hear about it, rather than being spoon fed the same old crap. When educators and archeologists insist that there were no advanced humans around back in 7000BC and then places Like Gobekli Tepe pop up and are reliably dated to 11,800 BC and beyond you really have to wonder when that sort of proof gets outright ignored, laughed off as pseudo science, and those who found it ridiculed and ruined over it. Main stream archeology has been ruining and harassing Graham Hancock for decades only to find out now that he's been right along. Now that Hawass is gone from Egypt's dept of antiquities perhaps some new data will make the light of day. That guy was an ***. Right now Egypt is drilling down below the paw of the Sphinx to the void that has been located there. I doubt they will share the findings. The Westerners who found the room were almost immediately kicked off the site and it was closed off to everyone. Mustn't have a drop in tourism...
 
It's not so much dishonesty as it is outright ridicule and character assassination towards anyone who makes claims which show that the long held and defended narratives are dead wrong. No matter how much actual evidence is compiled and placed in front of them. It is misleading the global population as to our true history for silly reasons like " Being proven wrong", " Casting doubt on the Bibles stories", or " Rewriting the history books". If there is new information out there then I for one want to hear about it, rather than being spoon fed the same old crap. When educators and archeologists insist that there were no advanced humans around back in 7000BC and then places Like Gobekli Tepe pop up and are reliably dated to 11,800 BC and beyond you really have to wonder when that sort of proof gets outright ignored, laughed off as pseudo science, and those who found it ridiculed and ruined over it. Main stream archeology has been ruining and harassing Graham Hancock for decades only to find out now that he's been right along. Now that Hawass is gone from Egypt's dept of antiquities perhaps some new data will make the light of day. That guy was an ***. Right now Egypt is drilling down below the paw of the Sphinx to the void that has been located there. I doubt they will share the findings. The Westerners who found the room were almost immediately kicked off the site and it was closed off to everyone. Mustn't have a drop in tourism...
I really can not blame the Egyptians. How would we like it if they found an unexplained hole under Mount Rushmore and wanted to dig a creator to fine out what was in it?
 
I really can not blame the Egyptians. How would we like it if they found an unexplained hole under Mount Rushmore and wanted to dig a creator to fine out what was in it?
I understand that. It is believed that they already have slid a cable camera in there and they know what's in the room. They have not said a word. period. So what's in there they don't want to share? Speculation is running rampant. If it were something that made them or Egypt look good they would have shouted it from the roof tops.
 
Curiosity killed the cat. When they are ready. You ever find something and had no idea what it was? Just maybe that's the case and who would believe them if they said it was an empty hole?
 
Curiosity killed the cat. When they are ready. You ever find something and had no idea what it was? Just maybe that's the case and who would believe them if they said it was an empty hole?
The scans showed that there is stuff in there. The chamber/room is not small. It is directly below the left paw. The Sphinx is now thought to be older than the last ice age making the chamber as old or older.. Meaning older than the Younger Dryas period, and the "flood". So, if there are items inside that date to the period of prehistory about which we know so little then the entire world deserves to know about them. It isn't strictly Egyptian history, it's the history of human kind on Earth. And as such they have no moral right to keep it to themselves. If it's empty of artifacts then fine, say so and prove it. If it has alien tech and a complete treatise on how and why the Sphinx and the Pyramids were built, then say so. What ever is in there, lets hear it. Too much of ancient history is and has been wiped out for political and religious ever since the invasion of the New World when those conquistadores wiped out whole cultures and all their history because the Catholic church said so. This crap just pisses me off. They have already had ample time to come clean.
 
The scans showed that there is stuff in there. The chamber/room is not small. It is directly below the left paw. The Sphinx is now thought to be older than the last ice age making the chamber as old or older.. Meaning older than the Younger Dryas period, and the "flood". So, if there are items inside that date to the period of prehistory about which we know so little then the entire world deserves to know about them. It isn't strictly Egyptian history, it's the history of human kind on Earth. And as such they have no moral right to keep it to themselves. If it's empty of artifacts then fine, say so and prove it. If it has alien tech and a complete treatise on how and why the Sphinx and the Pyramids were built, then say so. What ever is in there, lets hear it. Too much of ancient history is and has been wiped out for political and religious ever since the invasion of the New World when those conquistadores wiped out whole cultures and all their history because the Catholic church said so. This crap just pisses me off. They have already had ample time to come clean.
Just could be what they want to prevent. We don't have to go to Egypt to see the affects of wiping the slate of history to preserve a bias opinion.
 
The scans showed that there is stuff in there. The chamber/room is not small. It is directly below the left paw. The Sphinx is now thought to be older than the last ice age making the chamber as old or older.. Meaning older than the Younger Dryas period, and the "flood". So, if there are items inside that date to the period of prehistory about which we know so little then the entire world deserves to know about them. It isn't strictly Egyptian history, it's the history of human kind on Earth. And as such they have no moral right to keep it to themselves. If it's empty of artifacts then fine, say so and prove it. If it has alien tech and a complete treatise on how and why the Sphinx and the Pyramids were built, then say so. What ever is in there, lets hear it. Too much of ancient history is and has been wiped out for political and religious ever since the invasion of the New World when those conquistadores wiped out whole cultures and all their history because the Catholic church said so. This crap just pisses me off. They have already had ample time to come clean.
Edgar Cayce predicted this chamber and its discovery.
0FA8B814-D8E8-46AD-8E61-67691A0874BD.png

2AE9249C-884D-419D-8A0C-4D8B2D0DE7ED.png

https://www.edgarcayce.org/about-us/blog/blog-posts/awakening/
 
The chamber I am talking about is under the left paw. perhaps they are joined. 1982 huh? Soo....who has heard or read about the contents in the chambers under the right paw? I rest my case.
 
The chamber I am talking about is under the left paw. perhaps they are joined. 1982 huh? Soo....who has heard or read about the contents in the chambers under the right paw? I rest my case.
I read it as the entrance was under the right paw, so the chamber is under the left.
 
Now, after having finally finished " Fingerprints of the Gods" I am more convinced than ever, convinced by both my own observations and by his and many other scholarly investigators, that our current civilization on this planet is in dire jeopardy.
Unknown to Hancock at the time of his writing (1993-1995) there have been several recent discoveries and events that bear heavily on this belief.
Gobekli Tepe….comet impact sites across the Northern Hemisphere.....and the fact that the Earths magnetic poles have been shifting with increasing speed such that just the other day it made the news cycle.
Taken separately these are all no big deal. However, taken together, along with what we now know concerning information passed down to us all over the world, the actual historical record of this age since around 5000BC, and the facts of the Earths astrological progression over time, they take on a much more dire meaning.
To wit; The gigantic monuments across the globe throughout all cultures that were left to future generations to decipher, all are puzzles designed to be solved by science, geometry, physics, and astronomy. The dating of these monumental puzzles correlate EXACTLY to within minute portions of arc degrees to the stars in place at 10,450BC and no other time except the next end of the cycle of planetary progression, OR, end of the preceding cycle 39,000+ years before. In the time of 10,450BC plus or minus very little, there was the end of the Ice Age, the catastrophic refreeze and then sudden meltdown.
The continent of Antarctica has fossilized and flash frozen flora and fauna that could not have grown there in it's present global position.
The only way that these things could exist there is if the continent was previously in a whole different latitude.
The traces of glaciation in Africa, Asia, and South America prove that these continents were also once in different latitudes.
The last time the magnetic poles reversed it seems as though the earths crust shifted on it's axis bringing Alaska and Northern Canada up and around towards the Arctic circle and Antarctica down and around to directly over the South Pole instead of off to the side in more temperate climates.
The geological record proves this to be the case. Not the archeological record.
The archeological record is bereft of this data because it is all still covered in miles of ice. Or, it was destroyed in the global cataclysms of flood and fire at that time.
What we do have as a record are the Piries Ries maps showing Antarctica without ice and snow which have been verified as accurate. These maps were produced from even older maps and shown in a modern map projection.
This means Antarctica must have been ice free prior to the last ice age, meaning it moved during or directly after that ice age.
So, taken together all points of reference point to 15,000-8000BC as the period of great upheaval with 10,450 as the most likely point of catastrophe. Several ancient cultures tell of this all reoccurring around 2012AD plus a little.
It's now 2019, we have JUST now discovered Gobekli Tepe, we have JUST now found that the magnetic poles are shifting really quickly and at the same time the Arctic and Antarctic ice is melting faster and faster. We have just found that the Giza Plateau is an Earthly exact copy of the stars of 10,450BC.
IMHO, taken all together it is more likely than NOT that we are coming into the period where the Earths crust, due to the combined weight of the ice on both poles acting with ponderous centrifugal force as the Earths progression reaches apogee, and the fast movement of the magnetic poles, will move again, setting the continents in different latitudes once again.
Accompanying this crustal displacement will be horrific flood and fire along with the end of our civilization. The survivors will be so few and so gob smacked by being set back to the literal stone age that it will undoubtedly take many thousands of years for human civilization to recover. If at all.
Now, anyone else should feel free to disagree, and poo, poo this info all day long. This is what I personally believe to be our immediate future. Those who say that the Earth has gone along fine since creation and will continue to do so, are not paying attention to their own source book, the Bible. Not to mention all of the other evidence to the contrary. So say I.
 
better hurry that Coronet build along, then.....:)
 
better hurry that Coronet build along, then.....:)

Murphy's Law says that the cataclysm will strike right after the build is completed.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top