fourgearsavoy
Well-Known Member
It was 616/620 lift 288/292 advertised and 260/264 @50 Howards grind . never had that one down the track Covid hit and everyone shut down.280@ .050 ?? Intake lobe? That's a big one.
It was 616/620 lift 288/292 advertised and 260/264 @50 Howards grind . never had that one down the track Covid hit and everyone shut down.280@ .050 ?? Intake lobe? That's a big one.
is putting the old comp cams back in an option?Current cam in the car is an odd ball Isky roller. Got it in a stash of 4-speed parts had a tag on it 528 lift 244@ 50 and I'm running it with 1.6 rockers. Last summer it went 11.97
Fastest the car has been was when I ran an old Comp flat solid XTQ series cam.
Duration - 294/299
Duration @ .050" - 264/270
Lift - .567/.579
Lobe lift- 0.378/0.386
It ran 10.91 @ 124 mph
I had a Richmond 5-speed with a 3.27 first gear and 3.54 rear gears back then and the car weighed 3540# with the same EZ head 493 with 11.9 compression
I had a Richmond 5-speed with a 3.27 first gear and 3.54 rear gears back then and the car weighed 3540# with the same EZ head 493 with 11.9 compression
It's a race faceplate deal with a Long V-gate shifter. not really an easy cruiser box.I’m curious about what the reasoning was behind taking the 5 speed out.
It was a solid flat tappet camIf the Howard’s cam is a solid roller, and If I had the associated valve springs, I’d give that a go. The lobe profiles look a little aggressive.
I contacted Daniel Powell and he's going to spec a cam with lift in in the lower 600's for me.If you were satisfied with the performance and street aspects of the Comp 264/270 solid, it would be easy enough to come up with a roller that gets you into that range.
Duration-wise, the Powell cam looks pretty close.
Just see about doing something with less lift that can live with springs that aren’t hard on the valvetrain during the street driving.
It lost 2 lobes so I decided to go roller after cleaning about 2 spoons full of ground and powdered iron out of my block.is putting the old comp cams back in an option?
Yes it's a small solid roller and the springs are good to 650 lift. I'm confident we will come up with a good cam that will work with my combination.So you have a solid roller in it now, correct?
If so, consider this: if you know the specifications or part number of your current valve springs, give that info to Powell, and see what cam he can offer that will work with the current springs. Maybe nothing that you like, but it wouldn’t hurt to ask.
I agree that it’s too much cam for those heads. The flow isn’t gonna be there. Very little gain for the work and expense. KimLooks like the emphasis is more on the “strip” side of street/strip.
For something that will see regular street use, I tend to lean towards cams that don’t need a lot of spring.
Not everyone agrees or is on that page.
My advice for the OP is…….to just make sure he understands what you’re looking for from the cam swap, and that you understand what pieces you’ll need to upgrade to facilitate using that cam.
the springs are good to 650 lift.
I got them from AndyF and the box was marked Comp 939-16 . I checked them at 1.910 and they were 136# on the seat and 400# at .650Any idea of the brand/part number and installed height?