Devanhom
Member
You have purchased a 1969 Dodge Super Bee that presents a classic car dilemma, balancing its inherent value against the issues created by the previous owner's flawed restoration attempt. Your Super Bee is a numbers-matching, true Super Bee coupe equipped with a 383 engine and a four-speed manual transmission, making it a highly desirable and authentic muscle car. It also possesses several rare and valuable factory options, including the quarter scoops and the N96 Ramcharger setup, which significantly enhances its collector appeal. The car's history as a Texas vehicle its entire life suggests it has a solid original metal body, which is a major advantage for any restoration project.
On the one hand, the previous owner's work has created several issues that must be addressed, presenting a difficult choice regarding the car's future. The amateur paint job in a non-original Chevrolet Hugger Orange color is not only visually unappealing but also indicates a lack of proper preparation and bodywork. This poor surface is not salvageable with a simple cut and buff, and the lack of proper blocking is evident in the imperfections and unevenness along the body panels. The previous owner also deviated from the car's original factory specifications by replacing the correct tan interior with a black one, although they did purchase new interior parts from Josh's. However, the professionally rebuilt engine is a definite asset, and the documented $7,000 investment in performance upgrades ensures that the mechanical foundation is strong. The undercarriage, while showing some surface rust, appears to be solid and undamaged.
Your dilemma lies in whether to proceed with a full, comprehensive restoration, which would respect the car's originality and maximize its market value, or to simply finish the low-budget build to create a rough but enjoyable driver. A full restoration would involve correcting all the previous owner's mistakes and returning the car to its factory-correct condition, but it is a significant undertaking that you estimate would cost another $20,000 to $30,000. In contrast, completing the car as a low-budget driver would get it on the road quickly and with less expense, but it would not do justice to the car's potential or its inherent rarity. You are hesitant to invest such a large sum and potentially go "upside down" on the car, but you also believe that a properly restored version could be worth $60,000 or more.
Ultimately, the decision rests on your priorities and resources, but the consensus in the classic car community is that a car with numbers-matching and desirable factory options warrants a full, high-quality restoration. The rarity of its factory options and the integrity of its original components justify the investment required to restore it to its former glory. A high-quality restoration of this Super Bee would undoubtedly increase its value and make it a highly desirable car among collectors, likely surpassing your estimated $60,000 mark. The car's solid original metal and documented engine rebuild provide an excellent foundation, making it a worthy candidate for such an investment. While a low-budget driver would offer immediate gratification, a full restoration offers the greater long-term return on investment and provides a more rewarding ownership experience.
On the one hand, the previous owner's work has created several issues that must be addressed, presenting a difficult choice regarding the car's future. The amateur paint job in a non-original Chevrolet Hugger Orange color is not only visually unappealing but also indicates a lack of proper preparation and bodywork. This poor surface is not salvageable with a simple cut and buff, and the lack of proper blocking is evident in the imperfections and unevenness along the body panels. The previous owner also deviated from the car's original factory specifications by replacing the correct tan interior with a black one, although they did purchase new interior parts from Josh's. However, the professionally rebuilt engine is a definite asset, and the documented $7,000 investment in performance upgrades ensures that the mechanical foundation is strong. The undercarriage, while showing some surface rust, appears to be solid and undamaged.
Your dilemma lies in whether to proceed with a full, comprehensive restoration, which would respect the car's originality and maximize its market value, or to simply finish the low-budget build to create a rough but enjoyable driver. A full restoration would involve correcting all the previous owner's mistakes and returning the car to its factory-correct condition, but it is a significant undertaking that you estimate would cost another $20,000 to $30,000. In contrast, completing the car as a low-budget driver would get it on the road quickly and with less expense, but it would not do justice to the car's potential or its inherent rarity. You are hesitant to invest such a large sum and potentially go "upside down" on the car, but you also believe that a properly restored version could be worth $60,000 or more.
Ultimately, the decision rests on your priorities and resources, but the consensus in the classic car community is that a car with numbers-matching and desirable factory options warrants a full, high-quality restoration. The rarity of its factory options and the integrity of its original components justify the investment required to restore it to its former glory. A high-quality restoration of this Super Bee would undoubtedly increase its value and make it a highly desirable car among collectors, likely surpassing your estimated $60,000 mark. The car's solid original metal and documented engine rebuild provide an excellent foundation, making it a worthy candidate for such an investment. While a low-budget driver would offer immediate gratification, a full restoration offers the greater long-term return on investment and provides a more rewarding ownership experience.
