I will do that.I did quite a bit of research on using a 3.75 stroke crank in the 361, before I decided to just go with a stock stroke 400. Feel free to contact me if you are interested.
I will do that.I did quite a bit of research on using a 3.75 stroke crank in the 361, before I decided to just go with a stock stroke 400. Feel free to contact me if you are interested.
Flat top, custom compression height, so it will depend on the cc of the head chamber and the height of the deck which will get measured after disassembly. I would like around 10 to 10.5 to 1. Aluminum 440 aource heads and my 5 angle valve job, some light bowl work if the need it and port matching intake and heads. Machine work and piston lead time will be the big delays. Custom grind hydraulic roller as well.I look forward to your results. I had two different builds in mind, both of which ended up with about 406 cubes. One was my original 361 with a 440 crank, and the other was a stock stroke 400. A low mileage 73 400 practically fell in my lap, so that made the decision, but I always wondered if the longer stroke engine would make more torque. What compression ratio will you have with the custom pistons?
Their stealth 440 source heads. I'll do some bowl work and a 5 angle valve job. Port match the intake to the heads, maybe mill the heads to get the compression where I want it. Thanks for all the info, pushed me to do this, I think it'll be cool.What do you have in mind for heads?
Yep!Are you bushing them for 990 pins?
I read that thread, it was disheartening to see all the negative feedback on the stealth heads in there. I will be disassembling them and going through them anyway, so good or bad, I will post what I find. I do everything old school, stone seats, grind valves on my Sioux machine, hand port the heads. Worked well on my race car, 1120 rwhp and counting.I just picked up a set of E-Street heads. The 75 cc chambers will gain me a full point of compression on the 400. I'm looking forward to the results of this build.
I fought with those hoses on my Charger. Thankfully they didn't leak. I don't want to do that again.Finally felt good enough to get out in the garage and do some work. I wanted to get the fuel sending unit into the tank and make sure the float would go from bottom to the top and it showed the proper resistance. I had played around with it Christmas day some, bending the arms just a touch more which netted a spread from 70 down to 1 ohm. I moved a clamp around too allow the float to go all the way down to the bottom of the tank.
Today, I installed it and used my borescope to check how it all fit and it looked good. Neil and I tried snaking a coat hanger in to lift the float, but we couldn't get it. We did the next best thing and slowly rotated the tank until the float went to the top, or full, position. I measured and it was only 9 ohms. I wanted 1 or 2 ohms. Neil looked in while I held the tank and damned if the float wasn't hitting the giant vent tube. It's too far forward inside the tank, so I removed the sending unit/FP unit and using a bar and brass hammer, I tried to get it to move forward to clear the float. We moved onto replacing the rubber fill and vent hoses I bought from Summit. 120 bucks. What a ripoff. Anyway, they looked pretty good and fit, well, sort of. Better than the ones I bought for the belvedere. If there was a reason I would never own another one of these 66/7, it would be this absurd filler and vent setup. It sucks! We got old ones off, trimmed the new ones, got them installed and set the tank into place. View attachment 1969218View attachment 1969219View attachment 1969220
Yeah, I said that after the belvedere, now look at me. I looked briefly at these when I got the car and they seemed ok, but they were like cast iron in actuality, a leak waiting to happen. Glad it's over! Lol.I fought with those hoses on my Charger. Thankfully they didn't leak. I don't want to do that again.