A great Reason to install Ladder Bars

Racers Hangout

  1. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    I have Mopar Racer Friend back in Illinois who has the following car:

    1) 1965 Dodge 2 Door Post Coronet at 3750lb weight on the starting line.
    2) Ladder Bars with QA1 Single Adjustable Shocks on the rear.
    3) MT 31x10.50W rear slicks.
    4) Moroso 3 way adjustable front shocks.
    5) 512" Wedge Motor, 14-1CR, Indy ported SR Heads, Cam is 267/278@.050, INDY Bathtub Cross Ram with 2 750 Edelbrocks, etc.
    6) Transbrake with 5000 converter.
    Here are figures off his 1/8th mile time slip that he texted to me. He has several, very similar ones.
    60' 1.3309
    330' 3.980
    660' 6.2431
    660mph 108.18

    I think that consensus of opinion might say that if this car had Cal Trac Bars, Cal Trac MonoLeafs, Cal Trac 9 way shocks and Cal Trac 90/10 front shocks (OR any other leaf spring suspension) is that the 1/8 mile numbers would be more like as follows:
    60' 1.40 to 1.41
    330' 4.10 to 4.15
    660' 6.42 to 6.45
    660mph 105 to 106

    The reason for my consensus is that this 3750lb car with only 10.5W tires is cutting 1.33 60' and 6.24 1.8 mile ETs is fantastic and I think the difference lies in the Ladder Bar Rear Suspension.

    20170507_125316.jpg 20170507_131604.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2019
    • Like Like x 7
  2. davek

    davek FBBO Gold Member FBBO Gold Member

    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    1120
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2017
    Location:
    columbia
    Local Time:
    1:05 AM
    sweet,would like a pic of the rear.frame ties?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. rumblefish360

    rumblefish360 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,670
    Likes Received:
    1376
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Location:
    New York
    Local Time:
    12:05 AM
    Looks like theory not fact.
    Every suspension has its place.
    A lot depends on the power level and performance sought in what it is doing or designed for. Making blanket statements as if that is the best set up for all cars is just plain wrong.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  4. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    You are right....I appreciate your statement and it makes sense....I was referring to drag race cars with basically the same weight and horsepower and tire size...sorry I didn't make that clear.
    Also referring to the car owners who have the constant and never ending desire for lower Elapsed Times.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2019
    • Like Like x 1
  5. khryslerkid

    khryslerkid FBBO Gold Member FBBO Gold Member

    Messages:
    16,933
    Likes Received:
    22872
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Location:
    Hanover, Pennslyvania
    Local Time:
    1:05 AM
    Don't forget to factor in his rear gear. If he's mostly running the 1/8th they are probably pretty steep.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 1
  6. super-bee_ski

    super-bee_ski FBBO Gold Member FBBO Gold Member

    Messages:
    14,549
    Likes Received:
    12687
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Muroc Dry Lake Bed
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    WOW
    That is quite a Car!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    I forgot to list that. He runs a 4.30 gear.
     
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 3
  8. dvw

    dvw Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    5172
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Location:
    waterford mi
    Local Time:
    1:05 AM
    Nice car for sure. The 60ft appears quicker than what I would expect. The 330, 660, mph all look like they line up. So the question is why? Could be several reasons. First is 60 ft clocks. They vary. I race at many diferent tracks. At times I've seen 60ft vary .05-.10. Yet the 330ft and ET are very close. Another possibility is the converter. We've had some that 60ft extremely well, but ET and mph are not what they should be. The motor in this car also makes aprox 730 hp. Never discount power when looking at 60ft. This car obiviously is pretty close on its tune up. But to credit just the ladder bars, nope. As far as this particular tire. They work, many people have been way quicker than me on them. I have plenty of 1.24-1.26 60ft slips.
    Doug
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2019
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. biomedtechguy

    biomedtechguy Accelerati Rapidus Maximus FBBO Gold Member

    Messages:
    14,073
    Likes Received:
    19154
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    Location:
    South Louisiana
    Local Time:
    12:05 AM
    :thumbsup: and :lowdown:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    My friend texted me 6 time slips (3 from 1 track and 3 from another track) and they all showed 1.33 to 1.34 60' times with almost identical 660' ETs. I still think that if this was a typical Cal Trac leaf spring car all of the incremental times would be significantly slower. But the real question is how much faster are good ladder bars over complete Cal Trac leaf spring setup.
    My friend bought the car as a roller and had the motor built for it. He has ONLY run the car with the ladder bars that were on it when he bought it.
    The real proof of the pudding on Ladder Bar Improvement will come this spring when MALEX puts his car to the track, as he has directly switched from Cal Tracs to Ladder Bars.
     
  11. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    Sorry, no pics of the rear frame, etc.
     
  12. 6PKRTSE

    6PKRTSE Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,109
    Likes Received:
    1406
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Location:
    Motor City
    Local Time:
    12:05 AM
    Beautiful car. I like everything about it.
    With today's tires & shock technology. I do not feel ladder bars is any better than a caltrac/leaf car. More consistent, maybe. My buddy's local Grudge/No E.T. car goes sub .090's 60' & been 200+ in the 1/4 with Caltracs/leafs & 10-1/2" tires.
    Another GM buddy of mine went from stock suspension to Ladders bars that we fabbed up under the car & it never went any faster than before with that same package.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. dvw

    dvw Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    5172
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Location:
    waterford mi
    Local Time:
    1:05 AM
    I
    [QUOTE="Mike Gaines
    But the real question is how much faster are good ladder bars over complete Cal Trac leaf spring setup.

    The real proof of the pudding on Ladder Bar Improvement will come this spring when MALEX puts his car to the track, as he has directly switched from Cal Tracs to Ladder Bars.[/QUOTE]
    To be honest I think when the set-up is correct in the 9.00 and up ET range, either of them will work. My sons car is deadly on Cal Tracks. It has been 1.37 with a 3.55 gears, 275 M/T radials at 3750lbs. I do run ladder bars. Why? because they were cheaper and lighter than Cal Tracks. You need the same good shocks either way so that's a wash in cost. Coil springs are cheap compared to mono leafs. That leave Cal tracks, sliders, and front spring mounts vs ladder bars, shock mounts, and a front cross member. The two advantages to Cal Tracks are they work well in a street driven car and don't require welding to install. I'm very happy with them. If I was building a car from the start I would use them again. But not sure they're any better as far as 60ft.
    Doug
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 1
  14. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    To be honest I think when the set-up is correct in the 9.00 and up ET range, either of them will work. My sons car is deadly on Cal Tracks. It has been 1.37 with a 3.55 gears, 275 M/T radials at 3750lbs. I do run ladder bars. Why? because they were cheaper and lighter than Cal Tracks. You need the same good shocks either way so that's a wash in cost. Coil springs are cheap compared to mono leafs. That leave Cal tracks, sliders, and front spring mounts vs ladder bars, shock mounts, and a front cross member. The two advantages to Cal Tracks are they work well in a street driven car and don't require welding to install. I'm very happy with them. If I was building a car from the start I would use them again. But not sure they're any better as far as 60ft.
    Doug[/QUOTE]
    Doug, What you are reporting does make sense. I am/was so locked into the fact that ladder bars will make a better 60' PLUS and actually more important, quicker reaction times on the PRO TREE. I sure wish Malex's weather was suitable for his to take his new Ladder Bar car to the track...that can tell use a lot.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. coloradodave

    coloradodave FBBO Gold Member FBBO Gold Member

    Messages:
    3,255
    Likes Received:
    2510
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Location:
    Lincoln, CA
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    Mike, All Malex's trial will tell all of us is what difference the change made to HIS car. As I'm sure you know, what works on one car doesn't necessarily transfer to another car, even with the exact same set-up. If it did, everyone would be running the same set-up and there would be no competition in aftermarket parts. Part of the 'fun' of racing is making incremental changes to the suspension, shocks and tires to get the 60' times down consistently as low as you can. I'll bet there is more left in your set-up. BTW, I love your car...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    Dave,
    Malex's car and my car, although different years, are almost tony twins.
    His motor is very very similar to mine
    His Tires and gear ratio are the same
    Our weights are very similar
    Converters both made by Lenny at Ultimate Converter
    He had Cal Trac Setup exactly the same as mine
    and...we ran within .038 seconds of each other in the 1/4 mile.
    I have ran a 10.158 @ 131.54 and he has run a 10.120 @ 132.28
    I think it will be a pretty good comparison of Ladders versus Cal Tracs….(at least I will believe it....LOL)
    AND...I looked at your photo garage...that is one sweet convertible, love the new wheels.
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2019
    • Like Like x 1
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 1
  17. PRHeads

    PRHeads Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    424
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Location:
    So. Burlington Vt
    Local Time:
    1:05 AM
    And then you have all those stock eliminator guys/gals running in the 1.3’s using cal-tracs with way less power, often heavier cars, and on 9” tires.

    I will say this though, when my friend’s 68 Charger was running low 10’s/high 9’s...... he swapped from cal-tracs to ladder bars and his 60’ consistency improved quite a bit.......and the car picked up about a tenth........ along with it not killing the sidewalls on the slicks in 35 passes.
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2019
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Mike Gaines

    Mike Gaines Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    3269
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Location:
    Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    Rest my case...LOL...thanks
     
    • Like Like x 2
  19. dvw

    dvw Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    5172
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Location:
    waterford mi
    Local Time:
    1:05 AM
    [QUOTE="PRHeads, post: 911148171
    I will say this though, when my friend’s 68 Charger was running low 10’s/high 9’s...... he swapped from cal-tracs to ladder bars and his 60’ consistency improved quite a bit.......and the car picked up about a tenth........ along with it not killing the sidewalls on the slicks in 35 passes.

    The key here is it wasn't killing the sidewall. Did he upgrade the shocks?
    Doug
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 1
  20. theman440

    theman440 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    594
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    Local Time:
    10:05 PM
    Bob Mazzolini's A/SA '67 Hemi Belvedere 60ft's at 1.29 on a 9 inch tire and 3700 lbs with CalTracs.

    845326317.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 5
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 2
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.