Why, wouldn't someone prefer paying $99k for a late 70's Pontiac TRans Am turtle slug, rather than a real muscle car ? Or, $110k + for a rot-bucket K5 blazer or a crap on wheels Ford Bronco ?
Trucks/vintage SUVs have gone
nucken' futs the past few years/auctions
resto-modded trucks have gone ballistic
Notice you almost never/rarely ever see any 68-78 Power Wagons
or 74 & up Ramchargers/Traildusters, rarely ever
but;
every 10th vehicle is a 50s to now 90s GM or FoMoCo
truck or SUV,
(I'm a big fan of the 53-56 F100 styling, but not at them prices)
selling for $100k, stock or resto-modded even more
let alone multiples 100's of Corvettes or 100's of Mustangs/Shelby's galore
I don't get the 78-80-ish Trans Ams, anything after 77' was trash
in the eyes of Pontiac crowd, the malaise era smogged turds, Olds engines
or Chevy 350s into the 80s etc.
just a few years ago, they were 'Tin Indian trash', now they sell for way too much
&
I'm a Trans Am (Firehawk SLP) guy too, I had several from 1970-2001
I don't get the appeal of or crazy prices of the later 78-81's or the Gen 3s versions,
not nowhere near that $$$
had a few Gen 3s, & a Gen 4 as racecars very swoopy aero
1st gen 67-69 Camaro, is like $50k+ entry level,
$100k+ for a real Z28/DZ302 or BB 396 RS or SS could be $150k
(had several of all of them, made great light racecars)
Why ?
IMO is if it was extremely popular, sold a crapload of them to begin with,
it will be even more popular today
The early 2nd gen Camaros are nuts too 70-72s, especially real RS-SS or Z28s
now the 78-80s are in favor too
(I had a few of them too, I still like that 78 body style, not at their prices now)