69 Coronet driver might be a 3 1/2 on a good day. Maybe 20k. Thats why i keep that agreed at.
"#3 vehicles could possess some, but not all of the issues of a #4 vehicle, but they will be balanced by other factors such as a fresh paint job or a new, correct interior where applicable. #3 vehicles drive and run well, but might have some incorrect parts. These vehicles are not used for daily transportation but are ready for a long tour without excuses, and the casual passerby will not find any visual flaws. "Good" is the one word description of a #3 vehicle."
Hmmm. Sound familiar?
My opinion, yours is an easy #3 (#2 actually).... but yeah, that $35,400 for a #3 is a pretty safe bet I'd say.
Also a pretty safe bet you're not approachable on selling the R/T, either my friend.
The rest a yas:
Since Hagerty bases their numbers almost entirely on actual market results, I tend to believe their valuations
a little more than others.
It's interesting to look at such things but if you're like a lot of us, we're not going to sell our cars anyways,
so it ultimately doesn't matter what such guides reflect.
For example, it's interesting to me that the GTX typically shows a marginal price advantage over similarly
equipped R/T's from the same year - when they're mechanically almost identical cars with very similar
levels of trim.
Why? Who knows - that's just what has happened in the market the last several years.
Oh - I also do the "agreed value" coverage with Hagerty on Fred. The number is based on what I think it
would take to find another just like him should the unimaginable happen - not necessarily what Fred is
actually worth in an open market.