I don't know if you have seen the current Cuda fenders,but the first batch that they released had issues. My friend and I test fitted them 15 times on my un hit un rotted Cuda,and had them fix a ton of issues with them. My friend is very meticulous, and was personally responsible for all of the 71/72 b body sheetmetal being reproduced. AMD went the distance and retooled them several times until my friend was happy with the finished product. All sheetmetal needs some tweaking and refinement when you are installing them of 50 year old cars that have been crashed and rotted and rebuilt, even NOS pieces.I’ve seen Cuda fenders and decklid that were very unimpressive for the money they charge, they are better than nothing. They had to add metal to the edges to close the gaps.
![]()
View attachment 1034754 View attachment 1034753 Anyone knows why AMD make this “ incorrect “ in his Fenders . In my experience original fenders have just a round hole in it where I can install the small rubber bumper
Weld up the hole and drill one to the correct size. If that's the only issue, it's not that much of a big deal. We were not involved in test fitting the second generation Charger sheetmetal, and there are some issues with the pieces. I can tell you for sure that the 70 Charger front valance pans are spot on,because I let them use my NOS front valance pan to template them from.
I would love to see the factory in China where these parts are produced. ?
I was a tool and die maker, typically 10,000 parts is a min. before you see any wear. Specially with thin sheet metal. I hear what you're saying about being better than the others, but it's just crazy they couldn't be better for the very little extra work it would take. Kinda like not sanding down body filler before painting.