This definitely wasn’t a beater buildWas the crank ground as part of this build, or was it ground previously?
It would have been nice if they’d have called about that.
For a beater, I’d leave it.
But for a “good” build, I’d replace the crank.
This definitely wasn’t a beater buildWas the crank ground as part of this build, or was it ground previously?
It would have been nice if they’d have called about that.
For a beater, I’d leave it.
But for a “good” build, I’d replace the crank.
It is going to be a fairly mild street engine not sure that’s a beater or not lol will have tf 240 heads and small ft camWas the crank ground as part of this build, or was it ground previously?
It would have been nice if they’d have called about that.
For a beater, I’d leave it.
But for a “good” build, I’d replace the crank
How did you check this?I just checked at bottom it is ground about.020 different
Top was checked with a indicator, bottom was depth mic’ed with starret depth micHow did you check this?
I had a motor once, 2 rods ended up being .010 longer than the rest. But they were stock and a mixed set.
With your molnars that doesn't sound likely. But to offset grind a journal that much would mean alot of meat off one side and none on the other.
A true stroke measurement would confirm.
Not sure how the super stock tech guys do it.
Crank was ground undersized during this build so not a option nowThis is an option is to cut the bad journal .020 under on the long side. Maybe not the best solution but cheap way. If crank is already .020 undersized that's a problem.
If it was cut .010 us you could go .030 us. I don't know about going .040 us or if you can get .040 us bearings. It sure sucks. They cut the crank wrong so they should make it right. If they supply a brand new crank you could pick up some of the cost but that's your decision, if you want to do business with them in the future. It depends on how they act I guess.Crank was ground undersized during this build so not a option now
Small quantities as in, custom just for you.They make .040" under bearings in small quantities, or another crank and balance it.
Damn!Never used Kings, yet. Below are Perfect Circle/Vandervell CL77s. I always try to keep stuff that can have lead time on the shelf. View attachment 1498769
Here is a better picture everything is pretty close right side of block 2 and 8 are both .011 down, left side 1 and 7 are within a couple of thousandths, the problem is cylinders 5 and 6 are positive sticking up out of cylinders.005 and .007 thousandths. Decks look pretty level to me not perfect but plenty close. With exception of cylinder's 5&6 which seems to me the crank on that journal was ground different then the rest
View attachment 1498655
I did check the rods with dial calipers before giving them to engine builder, they definitely wasn’t .020 difference in length. The engine is a 71 out of a cuda I have had for 25 years. It was a standard bore, crank was standard on Rods and mains. It had a spun rod bearing. I informed him to check it out before doing anything and if needed I would get a new crank.Like everyone else, 99.9% sure it’s the crank. But you need to take and swap the #1, 3, or 7 rod and piston into the #5 hole to confirm.
I did check the rods with dial calipers before giving them to engine builder, they definitely wasn’t .020 difference in length. The engine is a 71 out of a cuda I have had for 25 years. It was a standard bore, crank was standard on Rods and mains. It had a spun rod bearing. I informed him to check it out before doing anything and if needed I would get a new crank.