Glad to hear you are good to go now. The crank grinding process was flawed because the crank SHOULD have been straightened first, then grind the spun rod journal to establish the crankpin size & stroke and finish the other three crankpins the same dimension. As to the people talking about offset grinding, that is incorrect. If a journal is offset ground, the end result will require a smaller bearing/rod big end due to removing metal from one side, thus changing the orbit of the crank journal. What the machinist did was adjust the "stroke" of the crankpin to accommodate the difference in dimension due to the damaged journal. With the crank index (90 degrees) and stroke set, the damaged journal should have been ground to size, and match the others. Also, as long as the radius is cut properly, it makes absolutely NO difference in crank strength how much is removed. As someone already noted, we used to remove 0.125" from an RB crank to put it into a B motor. GM guys have been doing the same to put a 400 crank into a 350 to make a 383, and there is a Ford combination that requires 0.280" to be removed from the mains. The nice thing today is aftermarket cranks are already made with the different sizes to start with for the different stroking scenarios.