Diagnosis MOPAR Charging System

[RJRENTON]

Hey Bob, I didn't see the word "ethics" used but I did see "etiquette" used after you made mention of
"specifically some Spanish person that knows nothing but pretends he does as his own work".
Now, you have said your piece, so scroll on and leave this thread alone. Entender?

OK.....
BOB RENTON

 

[Sinitro]

OK.....
BOB RENTON

 

[RJRENTON]

View attachment 1894630

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND UNDERSTANDING......
BOB RENTON

 

[Nacho-RT74]

Wow… thanks God I’m actually not reading anything from that guy, and he can’t either read my posts thanks to my request to the mods, but WOW, this time I even haven’t participated and it seems he is shitting me? Am I right LOL?

About the language (if there is relation or complaint about that on his post), I have had this image saved since several months now LOL.

(Please don’t quote me because he will know I’m posting if you do, and will get a “link” to access to my words being quoted)

He still don’t get that Doug (72RoadRunnerGTX) and me keep talking/sharing the same methods and explanations, but he likes Doug’s post and attacks mine’s LOL. His degree haven’t prepared him for that analysis and conclusion

 

[Nacho-RT74]

... Entender?

Actually the correct way to say it is “¿Entiendes?” That way implies the pronoun on the correct verb tense (2nd person of the present tense) for the full phrase saying “Do you understand?”



(Would be nice to have a “wink” emoticon around LOL. Dunno if the regular emoticons included on the mobile devices keyboards are available to be posted and visible on the forum)

 

[CHGRSE74]

The way I see it is Bob is envious/jealous/and completely disrespectful. IMO he should be banished from this group.

GROW UP BOB, are you 16 years old???

The moderators have spoken.

 

[Should be playing golf]

FYI...Engineers at Powermaster agree with Jamie at Dead Dodge Garage!

 

[72RoadrunnerGTX]

FYI...Engineers at Powermaster agree with Jamie at Dead Dodge Garage!

About the “shunt wire” by-pass parallel approach? No they don’t, no electrical engineer that understands this original charging system would promote adding a parallel path around the only circuit protection for the all the stock unused wiring. Do you mean phone support techs at a reproduction alternator manufacturer? They would be only concerned with not having to deal with a warranty return caused by inadequate charge path wiring or poor installation skills.

BTW, what Mr Attwood currently promotes as a “shunt wire” bypass is nothing new, has been floating around for decades before DDG. It’s a lazy conflation of the MAD Electrical approach, but leaving a original charge path in place, circumventing the original circuit protection. As for this shunt wire bypass “Making everything safe”, that would be Dead (Dodge Garage) wrong. Makes things much more dangerous.

 

[Should be playing golf]

Give them a call. They say you can put in a 125 amp breaker or fuse in line but it's not necessary.

 

[72RoadrunnerGTX]

Give them a call.

no need

 

[Should be playing golf]

The other parallel leg still has the fusable link in it so both legs are then protected.

 

[72RoadrunnerGTX]

The other parallel leg still has the fusable link in it so both legs are then protected.

I take it you haven’t heard of Kirchhoff's current divider rule as it relates to circuit protection devices wired in parallel? The presents of a fusible link in the shunt wire still exposes the stock unfused wires and components to current levels well above their ampacity in the event of a short anywhere in the stock unfused wiring, very dangerous.

BTW, most of DDG’s early videos promoting the shunt wire bypass (like the video linked in this thread) do not include any circuit protection on the shunt wire, straight wire from the alternator to the battery, some other youtubers promote large battery cables, no circuit protection at all.