I saw the car at Carlisle 2 weeks ago & I was less than impressed with all the cheesy aluminum add-ons. For all that work & money that a twin turbo set up costs, it just doesn't seem worth it to me for another 98 hp. Perhaps the car turned out to be such a big disappointment which is why they are auctioning it off?
BTW, the turbos are placed somewhere underneath the driver's footwell which seems to me makes for a lot of lot of plumbing to pressurize.
Yeah...
They sometimes look allot different, especially when you see them in person,
It's a cool concept, but may have not been executed as well as it could have been...
Kind of tough to tell on-line/photos...
Anything to get Ford & GM's panties in a bunch, is fun to see thou...
I'm not a Ford or GM hater either....
The major difference in power, not really
probably is because turbo's don't take power to turn them,
like a Intercooled Supercharger belt driven set-up does...
IMO could be the same base engine {I don't remember what was special about it}
& makes slightly more Free HP {not monetarily, it's pricey}, not being belt driven...
such is life
