6PKRTSE
Well-Known Member
NO, absolutely WORTHLESS. Unless youre just wanting the OEM "Look". Never has any 6 Pack/6 Barrel car Ive owned ever "Deiseled" at shut-off..
Same here. Never any problems for me either without one.
NO, absolutely WORTHLESS. Unless youre just wanting the OEM "Look". Never has any 6 Pack/6 Barrel car Ive owned ever "Deiseled" at shut-off..
thanks. Just looks funny with that finger dangling and not touching anything
Bolts attaching the carbs to the manifold itself.
studs with wingnuts to attach the air cleaner to the top of the carbs
carb to air cleaner studs A and C appear to be th eexact same, just different camera angle.
Studs with the shoulder is right for 70-71
Carbs bolts with the H on them is also correct for 70-71
Certainly agree the idle solenoid isn’t needed. My 71 had one when I purchased the car in 1982 so I ran with it. It wasn’t the original DR1114443. It had been replaced with a 1970 DR1114429 solenoid sometime during the cars first eleven years of life. Funny thing is I just this morning replaced the 1970 solenoid with a “rebuilt” 1971 solenoid that I purchased a few months ago. Very pricey but that’s what happens once you start down the correct numbers restoration path.
FWIW looking at the original image posted it doesn’t not appear the intake has provisions to mount a solenoid anyway?
Not on the six packs, had nothing to do with vacuum advanceThat solenoid is not needed it was a anti dieseling thing they came up with. It was hooked up to the Electronic advance (vacuum with a solenoid) to retard the ignition timing 5 degrees (why the ignition is off) and the same time un energize the solenoid. One of Ma mopars finest moments if you ask me! NOT!
69 1/2 if dual point uses a reg stamped style vac advance. Not sure which solenoid.Here's my thing, on a 69 1/2?
There's NO wire from anywhere to energize solenoid. Ive seen them on 4 speed cars, but have never seen where from which they come?! (Out of the wiring harness) that is..