Yeah, like I wrote in your other thread...The idiots at some of these places just
Set the toe and go.
You have to be clear with these guys, you have to tell them that you don't want the factory specs either. Those were based on the crappy bias ply tires of that era. These cars can handle extremely well with good radials and a proper alignment.
The printouts above are horrible for anything over 10 mph.
Here are some good bare minimum numbers to aim for.
0 to 1/2 degree NEGative camber
2 to 2 1/2 degrees POSitive caster, more is better but not easy to get.
1/8" toe IN.
The numbers above look like 1/2 degree POSitive camber on the left and 2.3 degrees positive camber on the right. I don't know how anyone would think that this is acceptable.
The caster...4 degrees negative on the left, 5.1 on the right?
I don't know if you could align the car any worse. Its as if the guy went exactly the opposite with the alignment cams than you are supposed to. I could do a mock up here at home just to see if my suspicions are correct.
Check this out:
View attachment 1910087
Look at the UCA on the left, this is the drivers side.
For the maximum caster, the point A gets moved OUT and to the left. Point B gets moved IN and to the right. This moves point C rearward, adding caster.
If you do the exact opposite,
View attachment 1910088
This will give you the terrible numbers like you see in that printout.
The alignment guys should know how to adjust caster and camber properly. That guy sucked at his job. I would not let him touch the car if you bring it back.