I don't think there can possibly be enough people returning used lifters to account for all of the wiped cams. But if there are truly only two manufacturers of lifters out there in the world, and one of them is not properly machining the lifter face, that would do it.
I not saying “this has to be it” or anything, but it seems like a very likely suspect and can be easily avoided if that’s a major contributor.
Here’s an estimate:
Say 1 in 50 people return old lifters as new
get 50 guys lined up doing a cam installs
can you image at least one of them returning used lifters to get a refund? I can... if that makes me an asshole... sorry
Let be optimistic and say 1/2 are flagged and stopped.
So that would be 1% of of new lifters on the self are listed as “new” but are “used”.
So every 7th a batch of new lifters for a build, if they were evenly distributed, would have one used lifter and take out a new cam
1 out 7 installs wiped out, if the assumptions above seem reasonable.
But it wouldn’t be even distributed; random is random. So what double or triple that...? 1 in 14, 1 in 21?
But if you multiply by a factor of 10, that still 1 wiped out cam for every 70 installations
and we’re going to hear about every one of them, because it’s freaking terrible
Maybe a good additional questionnaire would be to ask how many people found any “used” non-roller lifter sold as “new”?
see if the theory has evidence among us already?
Thoughts?