verdelaw
Well-Known Member
Has anybody else noticed this?
In my search for a handful of classic car models over seven years or so I've looked at several classic cars (both GM and Mopar) in person, been to a few swap meets and car shows, and seen probably thousands of cars for sale on the internet.. and overall it seems like GM cars (Chevelles in particular) are holding up better. I see more overall rust, more deteriorated quarterpanels, driprails, floorboards, trunk pans, gas tanks, and more corroded undercarriages with the B-body Chargers I've seen.
Did GM have some kind of better undercoat? Is it just because there's more of them? Were more Chargers bought by people in the mud/rust belt(s)?
Anybody have an explanation? Or am I crazy.
In my search for a handful of classic car models over seven years or so I've looked at several classic cars (both GM and Mopar) in person, been to a few swap meets and car shows, and seen probably thousands of cars for sale on the internet.. and overall it seems like GM cars (Chevelles in particular) are holding up better. I see more overall rust, more deteriorated quarterpanels, driprails, floorboards, trunk pans, gas tanks, and more corroded undercarriages with the B-body Chargers I've seen.
Did GM have some kind of better undercoat? Is it just because there's more of them? Were more Chargers bought by people in the mud/rust belt(s)?
Anybody have an explanation? Or am I crazy.


















