• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Progressive Insurance sucks !

99ss

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
2,212
Reaction score
470
Location
Oregon
Fair warning to all. Progressive is a horrible insurance company. Do no use them. They will use any trick in the book to deny your claim. Had my car broken into. My headers were stolen. Engine was out being worked on. They denied claim due to headers not being attached. Was with them for 12 years.
Friends don't let friends use Progressive Insurance. I will even start a web-page about it for all to see.

Between idiot windshield installers and assinine insurance agents I'm about ready to explode.
 
Thanks for the tip. Sorry to hear they treated you badly. I've had good luck with State Farm, have heard only terrible things about Allstate.

Just noticed that the ad generator at the top of this page brought up Progressive Insurance... HA.
 
State Farm has treated us well with our home and a few claims, I switching to them today as soon as I can. We had already been quoted from them. They have our jewlery anb home owner policy and soon to be auto..
thank you for the tip
 
I'll throw out another plug for state farm. I have never had an issue with any claim made with them. Even the one claim I had to make on the RR.
 
I work for the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation in Michigan. I have no doubt that your auto insurance denied your claim for your parts, which are never covered under auto insurance since they were not yet part of the car. Some policies offer a rider for personal property / parts, but these are usually specialty policies like Haggerty. However, your homeowners policy should cover your loss. You probably have an HO-3, and HO-3 policies are standard form. I just checked the policy. It looks like you should have coverage under Coverage C, personal property, which is usually 10% of the insured value of your home. Some headers should be well under that. However, remember your deductible, which could easily exceed the cost of the headers.

If your car was at a repair facility when the headers were stolen, you can go after the garage under Garage Keepers Legal Liability, Form CA Section 3, who will be paying this no matter which way you go, since your insurance company will subrogate against the garage's insurance to reclaim all claim money paid.
 
That sucks man.I know here in B.C. if you are working on your car over the winter months your car is not covered by there coverage. ICBC.Unit has to be able to start on her own So to get coverage on parked units I'm going to check out Haggerty.
 
That sucks man.I know here in B.C. if you are working on your car over the winter months your car is not covered by there coverage. ICBC.Unit has to be able to start on her own So to get coverage on parked units I'm going to check out Haggerty.

Haggerty is the way to go, youll find no problems there !
 
Progressive, like any other insurer, only covers what they have to, which is based on what you sign up, and pay, for. As Zdillinger stated, many insurers don't cover property stolen from a car unless it was installed in the car. A set of headers in the back seat are no different than a bag of groceries. This is why it's so important you read and understand exactly what you're buying, and if you think you need additional protection, buy a rider that provides it.
 
I fully understand the camera in the back of the car not being covered. Yes they were detached for repair but still inside the car. Yes I understand its the job of insurance to deny what ever they can to make money and its really a kin to scumbag scamming. I get it. And its my own fault for feeling like I was covered when we I didnt get a lawyer to read the fine print the insurance company paid a lawyer to put it.

BUT after 12 years this is how you repay me for a $1550 dollar claim? I got your claim denial right here !!!! No.... some insurance companies suck, plain and simple. They(Progressive suckass Insurance) would only cover 1000 for aftermarket parts no matter what I pay for a policy. State Farm already addressed it and still I'll pay less and get more than what I was getting.

I'll start a website and post up my experience with them and post up anyone else who has a legit complaint about them. At least if people know they can make better choices.

State Farm already told me they think it covered by my home owners and that all I need to do it let them know and they will handle it. They paid my wind damage in 3 days and I spent a good amount of time talking to them about my cars and mods to them so I'm fully covered.

No offense to anyone in here, I'm pissed and venting, dont take it personal
 
I fully understand the camera in the back of the car not being covered. Yes they were detached for repair but still inside the car. Yes I understand its the job of insurance to deny what ever they can to make money and its really a kin to scumbag scamming. I get it. And its my own fault for feeling like I was covered when we I didnt get a lawyer to read the fine print the insurance company paid a lawyer to put it.

BUT after 12 years this is how you repay me for a $1550 dollar claim? I got your claim denial right here !!!! No.... some insurance companies suck, plain and simple. They(Progressive suckass Insurance) would only cover 1000 for aftermarket parts no matter what I pay for a policy. State Farm already addressed it and still I'll pay less and get more than what I was getting.

I'll start a website and post up my experience with them and post up anyone else who has a legit complaint about them. At least if people know they can make better choices.

At least check on your homeowners, like I said above. You might have a $500 deductible, but that would be worth it on a $1500 claim. And definitely go after the garage, if it was at a garage. If you make a claim against the garage's insurance, you wouldn't even have to pay the deductible. They have a liability policy which will cover any customer's auto and customer's auto equipment and will pay for your losses

If you really feel that you have a legitimate complaint against Progressive, contact your state's insurance department to file a complaint. They will tell you exactly what I told you, that Progressive has no contractual obligation to pay, but at least you can get your displeasure on record and it will cause Progressive a little bit of trouble.
 
Haggerty is the way to go, youll find no problems there !
I'm not sure why anyone with a collectible car would buy regular insurance when can get better coverage for less with a specialty insurer like Hagerty. Unless you are using the car to commute to work or letting your teenage kid drive the car. They really aren't as restrictive as they used to be.
 
I fully understand the camera in the back of the car not being covered. Yes they were detached for repair but still inside the car. Yes I understand its the job of insurance to deny what ever they can to make money and its really a kin to scumbag scamming. I get it. And its my own fault for feeling like I was covered when we I didnt get a lawyer to read the fine print the insurance company paid a lawyer to put it.

BUT after 12 years this is how you repay me for a $1550 dollar claim? I got your claim denial right here !!!! No.... some insurance companies suck, plain and simple. They(Progressive suckass Insurance) would only cover 1000 for aftermarket parts no matter what I pay for a policy. State Farm already addressed it and still I'll pay less and get more than what I was getting.

I'll start a website and post up my experience with them and post up anyone else who has a legit complaint about them. At least if people know they can make better choices.

State Farm already told me they think it covered by my home owners and that all I need to do it let them know and they will handle it. They paid my wind damage in 3 days and I spent a good amount of time talking to them about my cars and mods to them so I'm fully covered.

No offense to anyone in here, I'm pissed and venting, dont take it personal

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYY would home owners insurance cover something that should be covered by auto insurance???? i just did a COMPLETE search of my ENTIRE house and i didnt find a set of headers bolted to this house ANYPLACE!

a little story for yinz..... back when i had my construction business...i paid a kings ransom in insurance to cover EVERYTHING. i arrive to the job one morning only to discover that the load of lumber ( a large load) that was delivered the previous day at quitting time...GONE!

I PROMPTLY call the insurance company and tell them that my $15,000.00 load of lumber was stolen. their answer to this was..." sir...we dont cover anything that is laying on the ground...we would only cover the lumber if it was standing erect..(..as in built....standing...like a wall ). my answer to her was.....( youll love this ....)...WHO IN THE HELL IS GOING TO STEAL LUMBER THAT IS ERECTED AND FILLED WITH NAILS? " ...so in escessence my good friend, this is their "out" of paying a claim....because they know damn well that nobody will steal erected lumber.....just as nobody would steal a set of headers that is firmly bolted to an engine!

the end !
 
i have my homeowners with State Farm, and they have been great. we had a flood (broken pipe) we were out of our house for 6 mos..they covered everything including renting us a house while work was being done.
my regular insurance is with USAA and have been with them for 25 years..but their collector car ins. was too high, as was their homeowners.
Hagerty is who my satty is insured with.
 
I'm not sure why anyone with a collectible car would buy regular insurance when can get better coverage for less with a specialty insurer like Hagerty. Unless you are using the car to commute to work or letting your teenage kid drive the car. They really aren't as restrictive as they used to be.

With State farm living in Kentucky with Antique auto plates, (this means no more than 2000 miles per year) I pay $120 a year for 35k worth of coverage. I find it hard to believe that isn't competitive.
 
With State farm living in Kentucky with Antique auto plates, (this means no more than 2000 miles per year) I pay $120 a year for 35k worth of coverage. I find it hard to believe that isn't competitive.
That's a very good rate Brian. I had State Farm for all my vehicles before I went to Hagerty for my Belvedere. Hagerty was almost half as much as
State Farm and the coverage was better. Agreed to value, unlimited mileage, flatbed towing guaranteed, etc. My State Farm agent said she couldn't touch that type of coverage for that price. There is no mileage restriction with collector plates in Washington. Insurance rates and coverage restrictions are different in every state.
 
I'm not sure why anyone with a collectible car would buy regular insurance when can get better coverage for less with a specialty insurer like Hagerty. Unless you are using the car to commute to work or letting your teenage kid drive the car. They really aren't as restrictive as they used to be.

I still insure my cars with regular insurance rather than Hagerty. Last time I checked, there were a number of restrictive clauses in the insurance, driving to work being one of them. I understand why they exclude it, but part of the way I get enjoyment out of my car is to take it to work every couple of months, or to run an errand with it. All the specialty insurers I have checked don't allow this. I don't want to be limited.

Maybe this has changed?
 
I still insure my cars with regular insurance rather than Hagerty. Last time I checked, there were a number of restrictive clauses in the insurance, driving to work being one of them. I understand why they exclude it, but part of the way I get enjoyment out of my car is to take it to work every couple of months, or to run an errand with it. All the specialty insurers I have checked don't allow this. I don't want to be limited.

Maybe this has changed?
I'll quote from my own policy.
K. "Classic vehicle" means a motor vehicle of unique or rare design and of limited production that is an object of curiosity and:
1. Is maintained primarily for use in car club activities, exhibitions, parades, and other functions of public interest or for private collection; and
2. Is used only infrequently for other purposes.

I'm not a lawyer, but that seems pretty broad to me. If I decide to drive my car to work a couple of times a year or take it out to a cruise night, I have been told by Hagerty's own rep that I'm covered.
Anyone else hear differently?
 
WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYY would home owners insurance cover something that should be covered by auto insurance???? i just did a COMPLETE search of my ENTIRE house and i didnt find a set of headers bolted to this house ANYPLACE!

a little story for yinz..... back when i had my construction business...i paid a kings ransom in insurance to cover EVERYTHING. i arrive to the job one morning only to discover that the load of lumber ( a large load) that was delivered the previous day at quitting time...GONE!

I PROMPTLY call the insurance company and tell them that my $15,000.00 load of lumber was stolen. their answer to this was..." sir...we dont cover anything that is laying on the ground...we would only cover the lumber if it was standing erect..(..as in built....standing...like a wall ). my answer to her was.....( youll love this ....)...WHO IN THE HELL IS GOING TO STEAL LUMBER THAT IS ERECTED AND FILLED WITH NAILS? " ...so in escessence my good friend, this is their "out" of paying a claim....because they know damn well that nobody will steal erected lumber.....just as nobody would steal a set of headers that is firmly bolted to an engine!

the end !

If you searched his car, you wouldn't find a set of headers bolted onto the car either, which is exactly why the auto policy didn't pay. The headers are not, and should not be covered by the auto policy. Regardless of what they are or the intended use of the property, they were not permanently installed into the vehicle and are therefore not part of the vehicle, and are hence excluded from coverage. A perfect example: you have two cd players in your car, one portable and one in-dash. Both are stolen. Your auto insurance would pay for the in-dash but not the portable. Your homeowners would cover the portable. Screwed up, maybe, but thats the way it is. It just isn't as simple as "home related = homeowners, auto parts = auto coverage".

For the purposes of this discussion, the stolen item could have been headers, a laptop computer or a bucket of fried chicken. Personal property is personal property. Homeowners covers all personal property that you own, no matter where it is. If you have a car that isn't licensed / insured and it burns up in a garage fire, who pays? Homeowners, even though its a car.

You know what one of the biggest scams in insurance is? Travel insurance. If you lose your luggage overseas, your homeowners policy pays, up to a limit. There are exclusions, of course, usually things that are lost in war / nuclear accident / etc and payment limits ($1000 on jewelry, $200 on cash, etc.). If you have lots of valuable stuff, buy an inland marine policy to cover it, but don't expect a bargain-basement HO-3 policy to cover it, or a personal auto policy to cover personal property. It will never happen, unless the insurance company is feeling generous (how often does that happen?). An insurance companies job is to make money by living up to the terms of the agreement (i.e. the policy) that they made with the insured.

Every personal auto policy and every homeowners policy is written on a standard form by one group, ISO, which means my HO-3 says exactly the same thing as your HO-3, except any riders that you might have or that I might have (also standard boilerplate written by ISO). There is no shady text put in by company lawyers to screw insureds. It may seem like it, but it isn't. And this is me, speaking as a duly appointed insurance regulator for the State of Michigan. My job is to protect insureds from wrongful action by the insurance company.

Bear in mind I'm not arguing what should be, only the reality of the situation.

tpodwdog, I'd have to see your file to determine why they denied your stolen lumber claim, but from the looks of it they didn't adjust your claim properly. Did you file a complaint with your state's insurance department?
 
tpodwdog, I'd have to see your file to determine why they denied your stolen lumber claim, but from the looks of it they didn't adjust your claim properly. Did you file a complaint with your state's insurance department?



no ZDILLINGER ....i didnt do any of that. this happened in 2003 , i was new in business and at the time i didnt know any better. i felt that it should have been covered and argued with them until i threw my hands up in the air!
 
Back
Top