33 IMP
Well-Known Member
- Local time
 - 4:49 AM
 
- Joined
 - Dec 21, 2017
 
- Messages
 - 14,387
 
- Reaction score
 - 24,458
 
- Location
 - taxifornia,soon 2b Arizona.
 
Risk, or unreasonable risk, has to be assessed
Ten miles over speedlimit, wearing a seat belt, verses 100 mph not wearing a belt. (We've all seen the latter).
Lane splitting at ten miles over traffic speed, with a helmet, verses lane splitting at 50mph faster than traffic, without a helmet. (I've seen the latter)
Crossing a busy street with a walk sign, verses running across a freeway.
Insurance should cover everyday risks we all take. Not unreasonable risk.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			Ten miles over speedlimit, wearing a seat belt, verses 100 mph not wearing a belt. (We've all seen the latter).
Lane splitting at ten miles over traffic speed, with a helmet, verses lane splitting at 50mph faster than traffic, without a helmet. (I've seen the latter)
Crossing a busy street with a walk sign, verses running across a freeway.
Insurance should cover everyday risks we all take. Not unreasonable risk.
				














