Mopar-Charger
Well-Known Member
I just rebuilt/built my 360. The original I had in the car was all nearly all stock:
Stock bottom end
Stock heads
Points
Performer intake
750 Holley Vacuum secondaries
727 TF
The engine I replaced it with has:
2.02, 1.60 Heads
RPM Airgap Intake
Holley 750 DP
Stock crank
Stock piston
Mp .458 Cam
Car:
1973 charger - 4000lbs with driver
727 tq - Stall UNKNOWN (probably stock)
3.55 Sure Grip
My problem is, prior to the rebuild. I could burn rubber like it was nothing. Now, with the built engine, I can barely get the tires to turn.
Burned rubber at 2300 RPMS with old engine - Reved up like a mad dog
Burned rubber at 1400 RPMS with new engine - Barely turns till about 2800 RPMS
What I'm thinking the problem is the stall converter? The new engine performs 10x than the old engine from 3000-6500 RPMS
TIming is set high for initial, about 15-17 Degrees. (doesn't kick the starter back) I've put it between 10-17 Initial and it performs the same on the bottom end.
You guys are racee car guys, this is my setup. How do I get the bottom end better?
THanks,
Jake
Stock bottom end
Stock heads
Points
Performer intake
750 Holley Vacuum secondaries
727 TF
The engine I replaced it with has:
2.02, 1.60 Heads
RPM Airgap Intake
Holley 750 DP
Stock crank
Stock piston
Mp .458 Cam
Car:
1973 charger - 4000lbs with driver
727 tq - Stall UNKNOWN (probably stock)
3.55 Sure Grip
My problem is, prior to the rebuild. I could burn rubber like it was nothing. Now, with the built engine, I can barely get the tires to turn.
Burned rubber at 2300 RPMS with old engine - Reved up like a mad dog
Burned rubber at 1400 RPMS with new engine - Barely turns till about 2800 RPMS
What I'm thinking the problem is the stall converter? The new engine performs 10x than the old engine from 3000-6500 RPMS
TIming is set high for initial, about 15-17 Degrees. (doesn't kick the starter back) I've put it between 10-17 Initial and it performs the same on the bottom end.
You guys are racee car guys, this is my setup. How do I get the bottom end better?
THanks,
Jake