Any recommendations on header back exhaust systems?

[67charger440]

I’m asking specifically for a 66 charger with long tube headers. I’ve read that a lot of exhaust systems that claim to fit b-bodies don’t actually fit the 66-67 charger due to the gas tank. Anyone have any recommendations from first hand experience?

 

[Beekeeper]

what brand headers do you have?

 

[67charger440]

what brand headers do you have?

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-g9141/make/dodge/model/charger/year/1967

 

[hunt2elk]

TTI mandrel bent full exhaust is quite nice. You would have to adapt at the front end if not using their headers however. I believe they sell a kit with pieces you cut and weld together for that.

 

[R/T Boy 67]

TTI has a 66-67 system with the proper tail pipes

 

[Fran Blacker]

Question 2.5" or 3"? Put a 3" TTI header back system with brand X headers. Fit great, I bought an H-pipe only issue was needing to add to crossover pipe. Crossover pipe was 2.5" went to parts store bought pipe slip over one end and go inside other end. X- pipe might not be as easy but don't know.

 

[Beekeeper]

All the replies about TTI was why I asked about the brand of headers. I would go with the TTI system and adapt it to what you have.

 

[RemCharger]

All b bodies does not mean 68-9. There is also 66-67.
Contrary to popular belief ?

 

[MelroseMopar]

FWIW I would go as far as to blindly recommend the TTI system for your application. I have never owned the year in question but the several TTI Systems I have installed on 68-72 b bodies leaves no doubt as to the consistent quality of there products. My latest set of TTI's were installed on a 69 Superbee with a 440-512stroker and a 4 speed with a scatter shield Headers are 1 7/8 long tube headers and full TTI 2 1/2 x pipe system with Dynaflo super turbo mufflers. I had Zero clearance issues anywhere and of note is that my headers are wrapped and I still have ample clearance.

 

[67440chrg]

TTI with Dynaflo super turbos sound great

 

[451Mopar]

The TTI tubes are pretty good. Mandrel bends and a decent, fit in general. Not exactly a straight bolt on with my cars, usually took some triming and adjustment to get the fit I wanted, but most of my cars are not using the TTI headers.
On the '71 Charger, have the TTI 3" H-Pipe exhaust, and Hooker Super Comp headers on a low deck 400 block with raised exhaust port cylinder heads. Anyhow, I had to frim the H-Pipe shorter to fit. Car has the stock non-HP tail pipes that turn down, and they fit good.
On the '69 Coronet have the 2.5" X-crossover system with the chrome tips and I had to shorten the tail pipes for using the tips.

Exhaust shop quality varies, and usually the tubes are compression bent, not mandrel bends, but a good shop can get the fitment real good.

 

[MelroseMopar]

The TTI tubes are pretty good. Mandrel bends and a decent, fit in general. Not exactly a straight bolt on with my cars, usually took some triming and adjustment to get the fit I wanted, but most of my cars are not using the TTI headers.
On the '71 Charger, have the TTI 3" H-Pipe exhaust, and Hooker Super Comp headers on a low deck 400 block with raised exhaust port cylinder heads. Anyhow, I had to frim the H-Pipe shorter to fit. Car has the stock non-HP tail pipes that turn down, and they fit good.
On the '69 Coronet have the 2.5" X-crossover system with the chrome tips and I had to shorten the tail pipes for using the tips.

Exhaust shop quality varies, and usually the tubes are compression bent, not mandrel bends, but a good shop can get the fitment real good.

Your right I also had to trim my ends to install the tips I had forgotten..