. the stock head at 78cc is, 11.06:1. No wonder it detonated itself to death in 5000 miles.
I seem to remember Kern Dog trying alp kinds of things to get his stroker not to detonate. He finally solved it. HE STUCK FAT HEAD GASKETS IN IT.
Not sure what KD had going on with his engine. We’re discussing Paul G’s engine.
Someone has cut the deck quite a bit to be proud 0.012”.
Personally I believe quench is overrated. Does it help with detonation, yes. Will it overcome insufficient fuel octane, poor chamber design, compression to high, camshaft to small? No. Is there is a difference between a .038" gasket at zero deck vs an .050" gasket at +.012" deck? Yes, the positive deck will have the dead area above the ring closer to the deck which is a small benefit, though very little. In this case that compression would still be too high. I'd run the thick gasket and get the compression down. At tthat point it won't care if it has quench. Many race motors run no quench. Especially boosted and nitrous stuff. My race motor runs zero deck at 15.1-1 with a .060" gasket. Just have to match the fuel to the compression ratio. In this case 10.3 using an aluminum head on 93 octane will never detonate.If the pistons are a true .012 out of the bore I would .050-.060 hg. And have the chamber in the heads and the dish in the pistons enlarged to get to the desired cr. More than .050 quench distance your opening the door to detonation again.
I dont know how much was cut from the heads by the first shop that screwed it up. The machinist who has them now is going by cc volume. One head was much less than the other. I am calling him today and will get the actual numbers.I have a couple of comments.....
How heavily milled was that stock head? I've cc'd a few and uncut open chamber heads are often near 90 ccs, I had a few come in around 86 ccs after a few resurface jobs.
And when 'mom' started dropping CR's for lower emissions the no quench engines pinged and dieseled themselves to dead.Note: mopar built millions upon millions of engines with no quench whatever..
I just went through a cam degreeing video from Britney. Link below. With the cam straight up the ICL is at 90, i want 108 asper the cam card. That is 18° retarded. This kind of rings a bell from the first time I did it. I think back then I had to advance the cam 4° to get the 108 ICL. Does that math sound right?Paul, you can put that cam in anywhere you want. I personally encourage you to experiment, and learn something. Understand that you will get a lot of opinions from folks that have never done it.
Checking PV clearance is always a good thing.
I am going to CC the heads myself when I get them back. Like Ronald Reagan said "trust but verify". Then I will know exactly how much head gasket I need. I expect to be around .070"Paul that cam has 4* advance ground into it. Straight up would be ICL @112*. With your 500ci and a potentially high compression ratio (did you ever get that figured) I think straight up would be beneficial or you could split the difference at 110.
Edit: I have no experience installing cam on 112 ICL. I have most always installed around 108 to maintain bottom end power. Because all of my engine builds or <400ci
It is installed dot to dot. That is how I took my measurements.Folks have two different definitions for “straight up”. One is straight-up is what the cam manufacturer recommends for the ICL, the other is straight-up is ICL= LSA.
You just need to be aware of this when you read responses.
Straight-up is such a terrible word choice for this.