. the stock head at 78cc is, 11.06:1. No wonder it detonated itself to death in 5000 miles.
I seem to remember Kern Dog trying alp kinds of things to get his stroker not to detonate. He finally solved it. HE STUCK FAT HEAD GASKETS IN IT.
Not sure what KD had going on with his engine. We’re discussing Paul G’s engine.
Someone has cut the deck quite a bit to be proud 0.012”.
Personally I believe quench is overrated. Does it help with detonation, yes. Will it overcome insufficient fuel octane, poor chamber design, compression to high, camshaft to small? No. Is there is a difference between a .038" gasket at zero deck vs an .050" gasket at +.012" deck? Yes, the positive deck will have the dead area above the ring closer to the deck which is a small benefit, though very little. In this case that compression would still be too high. I'd run the thick gasket and get the compression down. At tthat point it won't care if it has quench. Many race motors run no quench. Especially boosted and nitrous stuff. My race motor runs zero deck at 15.1-1 with a .060" gasket. Just have to match the fuel to the compression ratio. In this case 10.3 using an aluminum head on 93 octane will never detonate.If the pistons are a true .012 out of the bore I would .050-.060 hg. And have the chamber in the heads and the dish in the pistons enlarged to get to the desired cr. More than .050 quench distance your opening the door to detonation again.
I dont know how much was cut from the heads by the first shop that screwed it up. The machinist who has them now is going by cc volume. One head was much less than the other. I am calling him today and will get the actual numbers.I have a couple of comments.....
How heavily milled was that stock head? I've cc'd a few and uncut open chamber heads are often near 90 ccs, I had a few come in around 86 ccs after a few resurface jobs.