Maybe you misread my intentions. I think Stafford does deserve a ring because he, for too many years put up with that horseshit franchise in Detroit. I have always said for many years he is an excellent QB with the wrong team. He should have demanded a trade long ago. But that’s not who he is. He’s a good soldier as someone else on here said earlier. I had always wished the Vikings could have cut a deal for him instead of that also ran Cousins that they paid such an ungodly sum for only to continue his mediocrity. Stafford does deserve his ring and I’m very happy for him.Stafford didn't deserve a ring from his days in Detroit because they weren't good enough to win enough games to get to the SB.
Yep, it was a dumb call but I don't think it was a mistake. Reminiscent of the Chiefs. First ajd goal onside the five and dont attack the end zone. Then on 4th down inside the 1 they pass behind the line of scrimmage instead of kicking the field goal.
Ok - I give up on you. Stafford deserves a ring - I believe he and his team won the Super Bowl.If you deserve a ring because you played on a crappy team, why have the Super Bowl? Give everyone a ring as a participation award.
The only way you deserve it is if you earn it.
Maybe you misread my intentions. I think Stafford does deserve a ring because he, for too many years put up with that horseshit franchise in Detroit.
But he didnt deserve it for playing in Detroit.Ok - I give up on you. Stafford deserves a ring - I believe he and his team won the Super Bowl.
All I can say is - “You’re a Trip” Anything to ensure you’re right I guess. Whatever Blows your dress up…But he didnt deserve it for playing in Detroit.
But you did agree that he earned th ring Sunday.
Way to change tack. You went from deserving it for playing in Detroit to earning it by winning the Super Bowl, essentially agreeing with what I said.
And I sold his rookie card because of that., lolDid the sport casters play defense for Bengals? Can't be everybody wins. My team lost a couple of SBs. Beat Brady twice!
The only trip taken here was yours. You said one thing. I disagreed. Then you change your story, and agreed with me yet you say I'm wrong and now accuse me of doing what you did. Problem is, I quoted you so all the evidence is tbere for all to see.All I can say is - “You’re a Trip” Anything to ensure you’re right I guess. Whatever Blows your dress up…
Like I said - Anything to try and ensure you’re right. It’s people like you that make me glad I really don’t have to know you - I can just ignore. Another keyboard cowboy trying to start a bonehead argument just for argument's sake. My suggestion for you is to take a long walk off a short bridge - and don’t hold your breath.The only trip taken here was yours. You said one thing. I disagreed. Then you change your story, and agreed with me yet you say I'm wrong and now accuse me of doing what you did. Problem is, I quoted you so all the evidence is tbere for all to see.
Have you ever thought about a career in politics?
The reason the sportscasters favor the coastal teams is they are employed by the networks and the networks rely on viewership. Teams on the coasts have the largest viewerships, therefore they can charge more for ads.
Put two Midwest teams in there and its a revenue disaster according to the media. They feel its teams from "flyover country" and the people on the coasts wont watch.